USWBSI Abstract Viewer

2023 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum


FHB Management (MGMT)

Poster # 105

Fusarium Head Blight Management Coordinated Project: Integrated Management Trials 2023

Authors & Affiliations:

Isaack Kikway1, Wanderson Bucker Moraes1, Gary Bergstrom2, Kaitlyn Bissonnette22, Kira Bowen5, Carl Bradley4, Emmanuel Byamukama6, Martin Chilvers11, Alyssa Collins23, Christina Cowger8, Heather Darby13, Erick DeWolf21, Ruth Dill Macky12, Paul Esker7, Andrew Friskop9, Nathan Kleczewski3, Alyssa Koehler14, David Langston Jr.16, Laurence Madden1, Juliet Marshall15, Hillary Mehl16, Martin NegelKirk11, Nidhi Rawat10, Damon Smith18, Darcy Telenko19, Stephen Wegulo24, Heather Young-Kelly20 and Pierce A Paul1*

1The Ohio State University/OARDC, Wooster 44691; 2Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; 3University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801; 4University of Kentucky, Princeton, KY 42445; 5Auburn University , Auburn, AL 36849; 6South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007; 7The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; 8North Carolina State University/USDA-ARS, Raleigh, NC 27695; 9North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102; 10University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742; 11Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824;12University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108; 13University of Vermont and State Agricultural College, St. Albans, VT 05478; 14The University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE 19947; 15University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210; 16Virginia Tech, Suffolk, VA 23437; 17University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588; 18University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706; 19Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907; 20The University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Jackson, TN 38301; 21Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506; 22University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211; 23The Pennsylvania State University, Manheim, PA 17545; and 24 University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583-0722
*Corresponding Author: PH: 330.263.3842; Email: paul.661@osu.edu

Corresponding Author:

Isaack Kikway
kikway.1@osu.edu

Abstract:

ABSTRACT

Integrated approaches for managing Fusarium head blight (FHB) and deoxynivalenol (DON) contamination of grain include agronomic practices, resistant cultivars, and chemical control. Prothioconazole, metconazole, and tebuconazole are three of the most effective demethylation inhibitors (DMI) fungicide active ingredients (AIs) for FHB and DON control. While the efficacy of Prosaro (a premix of the DMI  AIs tebuconazole and prothioconazole) and Miravis® Ace (a premix of the DMI Propiconazole and the SDHI Pydiflumetofen), industry standards for FHB and DON management,  has been well documented, it is informative to determine whether newly labeled products such as Prosaro Pro (a premix of the DMI tebuconazole and prothioconazole and the SDHI Fluopyram) and Spaherax (a premix of metconazole and prothioconazole) will be just as or more effective than the industry standards when used in combination with cultivar resistance. Therefore, the overall objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of these new fungicides when used alone or as part of integrated management programs. To accomplish this objective, field experiments were conducted in several US wheat-growing states during 2023 wheat growing season. Separate replicated plots of susceptible (S), moderately susceptible (MS), or moderately resistant (MR) cultivars were treated with Prosaro, Miravis Ace, Prosaro Pro, or Sphaerex at Feekes 10.5.1 or left untreated, and subsequently inoculated with spores of Fusarium graminearum. Percent control (C) was estimated for FHB index (IND) and DON for each cultivar x fungicide program combination relative to the non-treated susceptible check (S_CK). Mean IND and DON in S_CK ranged from 0 to 74% and 0 to 3.2 ppm, respectively. Averaged across environments, combination of MR cultivars and fungicide treatments showed higher C for IND and DON than treatments applied to S cultivars.  For instance, across the tested fungicide programs, C for IND ranged from 88 to 94% on MR and 82 to 92 % on MS cultivars, compared to 82 to 89% on S cultivars. Additionally, C for Miravis Ace, Prosaro, Prosaro Pro and Sphaerex combination with cultivar resistance ranged between 89 to 94% for MR and 82-92% for MS. Preliminary finding from this study will provide stakeholders with useful information regarding the efficacy of the new fungicide mixtures relative to the industry standards when used as part of integrated management programs to control FHB and DON.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER: This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement Nos. 59-0206-8-195, 59-0206-0-126; 59-0206-9-120, 59-0206-0-125; 59-0206-6-008, 59-0206-0-153; 59-0206-5-007, 58-6070-9-019, 59-0206-0-184; 59-0206-8-192, 59-0206-0-115; 59-0206-8-189, 59-0206-0-138; 59-0206-5-005, 59-0206-9-122, 59-0206-0-139; 59-0206-8-190, 59-0206-0-141; 59-0206-6-015, 59-0206-0-155; 59-0206-4-016, 59-0206-9-117, 59-0206-0-132; 59-0206-8-210, 59-0206-0-140; 59-0206-8-199, 59-0206-0-122; 59-0206-8-211, 59-0206-0-144; 59-0206-0-173; 59-0206-0-188; 58-2050-8-013, 59-0206-0-175; 59-0206-6-010; 59-0206-8-189; 59-0206-0-179; 59-0206-6-012, 59-0206-0-189; 59-0206-9-123, 59-0206-0-118; 59-0206-6-014, 59-0206-0-191; 59-0206-9-009, 59-0206-0-185; and 59-0206-8-187, 59-0206-0-131. This is a cooperative project with the U.S. Wheat & Barley Scab Initiative. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.


©Copyright 2023 by individual authors. All rights reserved. No part of this abstract or paper publication may be reproduced without prior permission from the applicable author(s).