The
discovery of sRNA uptake by fungal pathogens of barley and delivery of sRNAs
and potentially proteins and other small molecules into fungal pathogens by exosomes
provides a strong rationale to understand the contents of barley exosomes and
the impact on Fusarium graminearum.
Recent work in Arabidopsis has
shown that sRNAs generated by the plant accumulate at infection sites and are
taken up by fungal cells, host sRNAs that function to silence fungal genes that
are critical for pathogenicity. Previously
in our laboratory, we showed, using confocal microscopy, that infection of the
barley variety Conlon with Ph1 spores induces multivesicular bodies (MVBs)
accumulation. To determine if sRNAs and proteins are packaged into exosomes and
delivered into F.g. during infection of barley, we isolated exosomes
from barley apoplast fluid. Transgenic barley (Golden Promise) plants that
accumulate the Arabidopsis (AtLTP4.4-GFP) and wheat (TaLTP3-GFP) nsLTP proteins
in the apoplast were used in the experiment.
We followed the Rutter and Innes exosome protocol to isolate and
quantify plant extracellular vesicles. Proteins
isolated from exosomes purified using a discontinuous
iodixanol density gradient (OptiPrep) were run on a SDS-PAGE gel and analyzed by
Western blotting using Arabidopsis TET8 antibodies. We found that the isolated barley exosome
proteins contain an orthologous TET8 protein that will cross react with the Arabidopsis
TET8 antibodies, indicating a promising marker for barley exosomes. Proteomic analysis via spectral scanning was
performed between exosomes purified only by ultracentrifugation and exosomes
purified by the OptiPrep gradient. An
approximate 20% reduction in Rubisco was observed in the post-OptiPrep samples
indicating enhanced purification. Gene
Ontology (GO) term enrichment was identified for vesicle mediated transport,
endomembrane system, GTPase activity, and several other classes of proteins. Specific proteins of potential interest
identified in the enriched exosome fraction (http://microvesicles.org/) include
small heat shock proteins, annexins, GAPDH enzymes, and GSH enzymes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DISCLAIMER
This material is based upon work supported
by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 59-0206-0-148 (McLaughlin
and Tumer). We thank Hailing Jin (University
of California, Riverside) for sending us TET8 antibodies. We also thank Peter Lobel and his team at the
Biological Mass Spectrometry Facility of Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and
Rutgers. This is a cooperative project
with the U.S. Wheat & Barley Scab Initiative. Any opinions, findings,
conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture.